NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2 Disaster Management Plan

Student name
Capella University
NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2
Professor Name
Submission Date

Disaster Management Plan

This presentation will demonstrate that these risks can be mitigated by applying advanced nursing leadership, interprofessional collaboration, and community-based practices. The plan will guarantee a short-term recovery and long-term strength of the population since it is planned out with elaborate planning and evidence-based intervention.

The children, chronic conditions, and low-income residents were mainly vulnerable in such situations, as well as the elderly. Such risks will be addressed in this disaster management plan because it will focus on infection control, equal access to care, and coordinated response efforts.

Evidence-Based Interventions to Mitigate Population Health Risks

Several evidence-based interventions are present which play a key role in protecting the health of the population following Hurricane Ian. Through the application of mobile health clinics, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and skin infections among the displaced people can be identified and treated at an early age.

Support for the Most Appropriate Interventions

The selected interventions are in direct response to the priority health risks identified for Florida residents affected by Hurricane Ian, particularly the risk of exposure to infection. Mobile health clinic also increases early diagnosis and treatment, which is significant in preventing respiratory, gastrointestinal, as well as skin infection complications.

Distribution of the N95 masks and hygienic kits is in line with the CDC recommendations on recovery after a disaster that was caused due to floods, and the control of infection within the crowded shelters (Sodders, 2023). To a large extent, water treatment assists in curbing the gastrointestinal illness related to the floodwater-contaminated sewage. These plans, taken together, are fact-based and adjusted to the environmental conditions that were a consequence of the hurricane.

You May Like: NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1

They are especially appropriate interventions, which can protect the vulnerable populations, including older adults, children, individuals with long-term respiratory diseases, and low-income residents. The intervention of mold remediation is beneficial in reducing respiratory exacerbation, such as asthma and COPD, which get worse following long-term flooding and housing destruction (Sodders, 2023).

Immunization would also reduce the tendency of outbreaks of communicable diseases in overcrowded living conditions. The available data on population health argues in favor of these strategies being among the highest priorities in an effort to reduce the health disparities and prevent additional epidemics. Overall, the proposed interventions represent the best practices of equitable and effective disaster response.

Ethical Decision-Making: Incorporating DEI in Advanced Preparedness

The beneficence defines the prioritization of vulnerable populations due with the older adults, children, and individuals with chronic diseases being the most vulnerable groups that are at more risk of an infection (Kaczmarek et al., 2025). Autonomy is observed by encouraging a free communication channel where residents are allowed to make informed health decisions. Such aspects of the intervention as diversity, equity, and inclusion may be combined to offer culturally responsive interventions that may make people feel trustful and promote ethical disaster response.

Addressing Inclusive Needs and Potential Biases in Plan Development

The potential biases within the disaster response may be the situation when the marginalized groups are discriminated against in accessing the resources and care. This plan will address the mentioned challenges by addressing outreach to low-income residents, migrant workers, uninsured individuals, and non-English-speaking groups (Badiezadeh et al., 2025).

The difference in access to information can be reduced through interaction with the community leaders and multilingual educational resources. Real-time data can be collected to aid in the allocation of resources fairly and reduce gaps in service delivery through the use of public health agencies. This strategy would facilitate fairness and accountability in the context of disaster preparedness by taking the initiative to reduce exclusion and prejudice.

Leading and Collaborating with Teams for a Comprehensive Plan

The main area of the disaster management plan implementation is the interprofessional collaboration. NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2 Nurses take part in the leadership of the infection surveillance, patient education, and coordination of care in the shelters and mobile clinics. The representatives of the health departments regulate the epidemiology and the work of evaluating the environmental risks, doctors provide diagnostic medical skills and the treatment of acute and chronic diseases (Glauberman et al., 2020).

The emergency management teams deal with the logistics, shelter activities, and supply distribution. An effective communication network offers quality coordination and responsiveness in decision-making under dynamic situations of disasters.

Role-Specific Details to Make the Plan Actionable

Defining the roles contributes to higher accountability and efficiency in responding to a disaster. Nurses conduct daily health checks, infection patterns surveillance, and hygiene and protection education to residents. Physicians handle treatment procedures and immunization; pharmacists ensure that medications are safe and accessible (Glauberman et al., 2020). The professionals analyse the surveillance data and allocate interventions and resources related to the field of public health. These roles will be defined to aid the action and minimize the number of delays during care delivery.

Role-Specific Details to Make the Plan Actionable

This is where community partners are critical in helping to respond to disasters through the involvement of the government agencies. The local and state agencies monitor shelter safety, rebuilding infrastructure, and emergency policy implementation. The non-governmental organizations also assist in supplying hygiene packets, foodstuffs, and medication materials and locating means of reaching vulnerable populations (Davis, 2025).

The social workers assist in the accessibility of medical services, shelter, and mental medical care to the displaced citizens. Such partnerships enhance community resilience and equal recovery processes.

Evaluating Emergency Preparedness and Readiness of Partners

The system-level analysis of emergency preparedness following Hurricane Ian proves that there are several essential areas, like workforce preparedness, supply chain stability, interagency coordination, and the presence of the communication infrastructure. Healthcare staff were very committed and versatile, yet they incurred a fatigue management problem, and surge capacity was also depicted due to long response times.

The supply of the needed equipment, such as N95 masks, clean water, and used equipment, was the first issue at the beginning, as transportation routes were closed, and the infrastructure was destroyed (Davis, 2025). The healthcare facilities, shelters, and emergency management agencies had an overall successful integration process, but it highly relied on informal communication channels. The results emphasise the value of evidence-based preparedness planning that is organised.

Overall, Florida had a moderate degree of preparedness in the disaster response system in terms of strong leadership and public health surveillance, and a low degree of data integration and logistical stability. The disparities in real-time sharing of information decreased the potential of finding the clusters of infections and allocating resources equally and within the shortest time possible. This would improve the efficiency of the system by increasing centralization of the communication systems and establishing standard preparedness guidelines (Davis, 2025).

Recommendations to consider are to carry out the routine interprofessional disaster training and cross-agency training to enhance the degree of coordination and preparedness. Continuous revising and improvement are essential in improving resiliency towards future health emergencies regarding hurricanes to a greater degree.

Evaluating and Making Recommendations for Improvements

Several evidence-based recommendations can be proposed to improve the disaster response and infection control of future hurricane incidents. The growth of the usage of mobile health clinics would improve access to medical services, the screening of infections, and the vaccination of the displaced and underserved groups. The adoption of the integrated electronic information systems would enable to monitoring of the trend of the infectious diseases in real-time and improve the coordination of health practitioners and public health agencies (Zolnikov et al., 2020).

Professional interprofessional simulations should also be conducted regularly to bring about a clearer understanding of the roles, communication, and making fast decisions during a disaster. These interventions are supported by literature on disaster preparedness and national guidelines on the role of supporting the health of the population.

In addition to that, it is essential to think of the possibility of upgrading the communication strategies among the population in order to facilitate the disaster response to be more efficient. Establishment of text messages, radio, and community calls as multilingual and culturally relevant communication strategies will ensure that each section of the population receives the information on health promptly and in the right form.

Feedback systems will allow the public health officials to adapt the message to the appropriate needs of the population and emerging risks (Zolnikov et al., 2020). The benefits of such changes will amount to financial and workforce training, yet, in the long-term, the outcomes will include reduced rates of infection, a higher level of equity, stronger feeling of community trust. Such innovations relate to the best practices proposed by the health care agencies on both the federal and international levels.

Examples Illustrating Pros and Cons of the Recommendations

The benefits of the suggested recommendations include the expansion of health equity, reduction in the response time, and enhancement of interagency coordination. Mobile clinics and data-driven decision-making promote accessibility and decision-making. However, financial cost, employee capacity development, and infrastructure are issues (Zolnikov et al., 2020). These constraints are not greater than the limitations in the long term with such restrictions in place. Such strategies have to be invested in sustainable disaster management.

Conclusion

Hurricane Ian showed the relevance of evidence-based and ethically based disaster management plans in the context of the threat of infection. The focus on interprofessional cooperation, equitable distribution of resources, and culturally sensitive communication is in this plan. Nurse leadership is required to organize and lead the care and guide infection prevention. The presented strategy will promote community resilience by implementing the principles of DEI and systems-level evaluation. Lastly, this type of disaster management plan enhances population health and future hurricane readiness.

References

Badiezadeh, S., Naseh, M., & Howard, A. (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9090365

Davis, A. H. (2025). https://www.academia.edu/download/124128088/Ashley_Harrison_Davis_2025_7.10.25.pdf

Glauberman, G. H. R., Wong, L. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20200520-11

Kaczmarek, A., Żok, A., & Baum, E. (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1579778

Li, X., Qiang, Y., & Cervone, G. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2024.2341703

Shrestha, A., Howland, G. J., & Chini, C. M. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad097b

Sodders, N. (2023). https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7218a5

Zolnikov, T. R., Garces, K. P., Bolter, K., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100251

NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2 Disaster Management Plan